Fans of Strictly Come Dancing have been left fuming after the judges awarded exceptionally high scores to two contestants in the most recent episode, sparking a wave of outrage on social media.

Viewers, who have long been vocal about the fairness of the judging process, took to platforms like Twitter and Instagram to express their displeasure, accusing the panel of being biased and overly generous in their scoring.

The furious reactions come after both couples received what many fans described as “grossly overmarked” scores, with many suggesting that the judges might have a hidden agenda in wanting the two couples to progress further in the competition.

The controversy erupted following a dramatic episode in which several performances were delivered, with some contestants leaving the stage having clearly performed at a high standard,

while others were criticized for lackluster routines. However, it was the seemingly inflated scores awarded to these two particular couples that ignited the firestorm of comments online.

Fans felt that the marks given did not accurately reflect the quality of the performances, with many suggesting that the judges’ generosity was bordering on the excessive.

One of the couples that drew significant criticism for receiving higher-than-expected scores was seen as having struggled with their routine, making mistakes and stumbling through parts of their dance.

Despite the obvious flaws, they were awarded high marks by the judges, which many fans found to be unfair. “How are they getting 8s and 9s for that?” one viewer wrote in frustration on Twitter.

“It wasn’t even close to the level of some of the other contestants who got lower scores. They’re clearly being overmarked, and it’s just not right.”

Another couple, who had also made several errors during their performance, were given similarly high scores, which added to the growing sense of frustration among fans.

“I don’t get it,” another tweet read. “These scores are a joke. They must really want them to win. It’s like they’re getting special treatment.

Grossly overmarked!” The consensus among many viewers was that the judges were being too lenient, and that their scoring wasn’t in line with the general standard of the competition.

The fallout from these decisions has raised concerns about the credibility of the judging panel and whether the competition is becoming less about true talent and more about favoritism or entertainment value.

Fans have accused the judges of being too focused on the show’s narrative, potentially marking some contestants higher than they deserve in order to create a more compelling storyline.

Others expressed disappointment, stating that they tuned into Strictly for an honest and fair competition, but the recent scores had left them questioning whether the show was truly impartial.

“It’s like they’re just picking favorites now,” said one fan. “The whole point of the show is about merit, not about pushing people forward just because you like them.”

This outrage isn’t entirely new. Strictly Come Dancing has faced its fair share of criticism over the years regarding its judging process, with some fans regularly pointing out what they perceive as biased decisions.

However, this particular outcry seems to be the largest in recent times, with many viewers united in their belief that the recent scoring was not just unfair, but possibly rigged to benefit certain contestants.

In response to the backlash, many social media users have begun comparing the scores of the two overmarked couples with those given to other contestants, fueling further anger.

Some viewers even went so far as to suggest that the show might be deliberately tilting the scales in favor of these couples, possibly to make for a more entertaining competition.

While there is no evidence to support these claims, the online reactions have created a swell of discontent among fans, leading to trending hashtags such as #Overmarked and #StrictlyFix.

The judges themselves have yet to address the accusations, and it remains to be seen whether they will address the controversy directly.

Historically, the panel has defended their scoring, with each judge giving their personal insights and rationale behind their marks, but the growing frustration from fans has cast doubt on whether the system is truly objective.

Some fans have also called for transparency, suggesting that it would help if the judges provided more detailed explanations as to why certain contestants were marked higher than others, especially when their performances seem to have glaring flaws.

While the ongoing saga of the Strictly judging panel’s scoring practices has made headlines, it’s also sparked a wider conversation about how reality TV competitions balance fairness with entertainment.

The show has always been a mix of skill, personality, and audience appeal, but for many fans, the fairness of the competition is paramount.

As viewers, they expect that those who work hardest and perform best should be rewarded, not those who are favored by the judges for reasons beyond their control.

As the season progresses, it’s likely that the debate over the scoring will continue to intensify. Whether the judges will adjust their scoring to placate disgruntled fans, or whether they will continue to defend their choices, remains to be seen.

One thing is clear: for many Strictly fans, the recent scores have been a step too far, and the calls for fairness and transparency will only grow louder as the competition moves toward its climax.